"Roland Perry" <roland.TakeThisOut@perry.co.uk> wrote in message
news:yat9BntL9XxHFAIo@perry.co.uk...
> In message <47c57827$0$2452$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk>, at 14:47:34 on Wed,
> 27 Feb 2008, dc <dc.TakeThisOut@dc.co.uk> remarked:
>>I've had 2 more letters from BA today, from different departments. One
>>says
>>they looking into it and one says that under "recital 14 & 15 of EU Reg
>>261/2004 extraordinary circumstances include unexpected shortcomings,
>>weather, etc..."
>>
>>God knows if it does.
>
> There's enough in there to Google the Regs fairly easily. I'm fairly
> confident they are capable of quoting the regs, even if from time to time
> they might be tempted to decree a particular flight falls the wrong side
> of the borderline.
>
>>I'm fed up with them all now. I've got £100 for each
>>of us in vouchers and was only after about £150 or so under the EU
>>legislation.
>
> Sounds to me like it's worth calling it quits.
Not when it's in Vouchers it's not.
There is at least one airline who wouldn't let you spend vouchers online.
They force you to phone up and pay the higher non-web price. I suspect that
there will be others.
By the time you have paid an extra 20 pound per leg for your journey, a 50
pound voucher is effectively worthless.
tim
>> Stay informed about: BA Stonewalling...