James wrote to David Bennetts on Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:18:25
GMT:
DB>> "Mike O'Sullivan" <mike.TakeThisOut@nowhere.com> wrote in message
DB>> news:61gqt4F1vceaiU1@mid.individual.net...
??>>> nightjar <cpb@ wrote:
??>>>> "Olive Green" <michaelnewport.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote in
??>>>> message
??>>>>
JS>
news:e4f1af34-9339-4e23-b9ad-bbd0f787cd13@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
??>>>>> ...I dont suppose this works in the UK.....
??>>>>
??>>>> It does, but 999 is much better known.
??>>>
??>>> A survey some time ago amongst young people in the UK
??>>> revealed the fact that many thought that it was 911.
DB>> Same applies in Australia. Our emergency number is 000,
DB>> and it was found that a lot of people were dialing 911.
DB>> 112 may be used from a mobile phone here as well, even
DB>> works without a sim card.
JS> The use of 911 seems pretty much to be the influence of
JS> American TV shows in Australia. I have read the rationales
JS> for the various numbers but in this age of push buttons,
JS> none seem distinctly superior. I suppose, national pride,
JS> chauvinism and "Not Invented Here" will prevent the
JS> adoption of a single international number. I'm used to 911
JS> but a repeated digit might seem better.
I guess I might as well mention that 999 was justified as being
easiest to find in the dark since it was the last number on a
British phone dial. However, I can't even recall with any
certainty what a real dial looks like
James Silverton
Potomac, Maryland
E-mail, with obvious alterations:
not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not
>> Stay informed about: European emergency number:112