Standby on International Flights

Correct!

Since 9/11 no standby on International flights. It's all to do with the
checks necessary before they'll allow you to park your butt on an
international flight seat anywhere!



"Dick Adams" <rdadams.RemoveThis@panix.com> wrote in message
news:fhh96b$rb5$1@reader1.panix.com...
>I was to fly Baltimore to Los Angeles to Sydney to Perth
> and returning Canberra to Sydney to Los Angeles to Baltimore.
> My mate in Perth was planing a trip to Brisbane and offered
> to drop me off in Canberra. When my mate in Canberra passed
> away last month, so did my plans for a week in Canberra.
> So I called Quantas to see if I could return from Brisbane
> and offering to fly standby. They said 'no standby' is
> allowed on international flights?
>
> Is this new or is my chain being jerked?
>
> Dick
 >> Stay informed about: Standby on International Flights 

On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:18:42 +1100, Alan S <nothere.DeleteThis@there.com>
wrote in <jiaoj3p18tmgeecmmoji6ahrbrgnpandf5.DeleteThis@4ax.com> :

>On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:05:47 +0000 (UTC), rdadams.DeleteThis@panix.com
>(Dick Adams) wrote:
>
>>I was to fly Baltimore to Los Angeles to Sydney to Perth
>>and returning Canberra to Sydney to Los Angeles to Baltimore.
>>My mate in Perth was planing a trip to Brisbane and offered
>>to drop me off in Canberra. When my mate in Canberra passed
>>away last month, so did my plans for a week in Canberra.
>>So I called Quantas to see if I could return from Brisbane
>>and offering to fly standby. They said 'no standby' is
>>allowed on international flights?
>>
>>Is this new or is my chain being jerked?
>>
>>Dick
>
>I don't recall standby being offered on any Australian
>airlines flights for many years now. I'm probably wrong, but
>if it does exist it is nothing like the US system.

Hi, Dick & Alan:

The IATA [International Air Transport Association] has been
around a long time, and represents most airlines. You, Alan,
probably know more about it than I do, but other readers may not
be aware of the extent of its activities. Basically:

"IATA is an international trade body, created some 60
years ago by a group of airlines. Today, IATA represents over 240
airlines comprising 94% of scheduled international air traffic.
The organization also represents, leads and serves the airline
industry in general."
http://www.iata.org/about/

When I originally came from the U.S. to Australia in the '60s
they published to large guides, similar in size to large phone
books, one for the U.S., the other for the rest of the world,
every month for the use of travel agents.

Very useful for planning, as listed every scheduled commercial
flight between any two locations, standard fares, which airlines
had special deals on, and so on.

They also assign the two letter airline codes and the three
letter airport codes. Recently I mentioned that when
I came down we had a refueling stop at Nandi, Fiji.

Actually, the airport is "Nadi" in Fijian, but is pronounced
"Nandi" in English. As it is in or near Suva, the code is
"SUV".

To quote a bit from Wikipedia:
"IATA was formed in April 1945, in Havana, Cuba. It is the
successor to the International Air Traffic Association, founded
in The Hague in 1919, the year of the world's first international
scheduled services. At its founding, IATA had 57 members from 31
nations, mostly in Europe and North America. Today it has over
240 members from more than 140 nations in every part of the
globe.

For fare calculations IATA has divided the world in three
regions:

1. South, Central and North America.
2. Europe, Middle East and Africa. IATA Europe includes the
geographical Europe and Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia.
3. Asia, Australia, New Zealand and the islands of the Pacific
Ocean.

To this end, airlines have been granted a special exemption by
each of the main regulatory authorities in the world to consult
prices with each other through this body. However, the
organisation has been accused of acting as a cartel, and many low
cost carriers are not full IATA members. . .

More at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Air_Transport_Association

Looking ahead to the reply from "a mate" he suggests that
security is the reason that "standby" is frowned upon.

"Standby" certainly used to exist in the USA, and it was one
of the "lurks" to get cheap travel. Some tourists used to
book on 2, 3 or more flights to ensure they would get a flight.

They would take one, and wouldn't show up for the others.
Very annoying to airlines, of course, as meant they didn't have
a full load at their scheduled departure time. So they offered
a bit of a discount for tourists who would show up at the
airport and be ready to board in that last ten minutes.

With increased security, of course, they aren't going to let
anyone on an aircraft without a security check. When I left the
US, there wasn't any such check, IIRC. It didn't take long
to issue a standby passenger with a ticket and boarding pass,
and get them aboard.

There had been earlier hijackings on domestic flights, by armed
hijackers, but apparently not enough to bring in passenger
screenings and inconvenience passengers with delays. I wasn't
on "standby" when I left, but I don't remember any security
checks.

At the time there was another good lurk for cheap travel going,
if didn't mind sea travel. By international law, cargo
freighters had to provide 10 or 12 passenger cabins, but
they were seldom filled up. So the "lurk" was keep an eye on the
local shipping news, then turn up at the dock an hour or
less before the ship was due to leave. A quick talk with
a ships officer, and could negotiate a fare for a pretty
good discount.

Later, of course, this became more organized, and they
started offering standard fares. Were usually a bit
cheaper than passenger liners, and considerably more
informal.

Of course, it was a simpler and more trusting world in those
days.

Cheers,
Kangaroo16



>
>
>
>
>
>Cheers, Alan, Australia
 >> Stay informed about: Standby on International Flights 

On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:12:29 GMT, kangaroo16
<kangaroo16.DeleteThis@invalid.com> wrote:

>Of course, it was a simpler and more trusting world in those
>days.

Maybe. However, "standby" was very much in evidence with AA
in the USA last year at ORD and LAX. There were monitor
screens at the boarding lounges showing who was top of the
standby list.

I remember thinking that it may be wise to buy shares in US
airlines at that time as every flight seemed to be 100% full
and just prior to final boarding they would announce that no
standby seats were available. Nor did I see any empty seats
on the plane.


Cheers, Alan, Australia
--
http://loraltravel.blogspot.com/
latest: Slovenia
http://loraltraveloz.blogspot.com/
latest: Mossman Gorge in the Daintree Rainforest
 >> Stay informed about: Standby on International Flights 

"Alan S" <nothere.DeleteThis@there.com> wrote in message
news:qohpj39ohifdoav65u90gf6da73v6mtmvo@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:12:29 GMT, kangaroo16
> <kangaroo16.DeleteThis@invalid.com> wrote:
>
>>Of course, it was a simpler and more trusting world in those
>>days.
>
> Maybe. However, "standby" was very much in evidence with AA
> in the USA last year at ORD and LAX. There were monitor
> screens at the boarding lounges showing who was top of the
> standby list.
>
> I remember thinking that it may be wise to buy shares in US
> airlines at that time as every flight seemed to be 100% full
> and just prior to final boarding they would announce that no
> standby seats were available. Nor did I see any empty seats
> on the plane.
>
>
> Cheers, Alan, Australia
> --
> http://loraltravel.blogspot.com/
> latest: Slovenia
> http://loraltraveloz.blogspot.com/
> latest: Mossman Gorge in the Daintree Rainforest

And those standby's are on tickets that allow changes. So they may be a
business man trying be get out on an earlier flight. Not like the olden
days of Standby, where you got a cheap fare at the last minute.
 >> Stay informed about: Standby on International Flights 

On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 19:59:17 -0800, "Calif Bill"
<bmckeespam.DeleteThis@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
<13jq5cj2i2mok4b.DeleteThis@corp.supernews.com> :

>
>"Alan S" <nothere.DeleteThis@there.com> wrote in message
>news:qohpj39ohifdoav65u90gf6da73v6mtmvo@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:12:29 GMT, kangaroo16
>> <kangaroo16.DeleteThis@invalid.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Of course, it was a simpler and more trusting world in those
>>>days.
>>
>> Maybe. However, "standby" was very much in evidence with AA
>> in the USA last year at ORD and LAX. There were monitor
>> screens at the boarding lounges showing who was top of the
>> standby list.
>>
>> I remember thinking that it may be wise to buy shares in US
>> airlines at that time as every flight seemed to be 100% full
>> and just prior to final boarding they would announce that no
>> standby seats were available. Nor did I see any empty seats
>> on the plane.
>>
>>
>> Cheers, Alan, Australia
>> --
>> http://loraltravel.blogspot.com/
>> latest: Slovenia
>> http://loraltraveloz.blogspot.com/
>> latest: Mossman Gorge in the Daintree Rainforest
>
>And those standby's are on tickets that allow changes. So they may be a
>business man trying be get out on an earlier flight. .
>
Greetings, "Calif Bill"!

Thanks for the info update! If they are a business man, though,
I would assume that they have to go through the usual security
scan each time, whether they are successful or unsuccessful in
making the particular flight.

If this is true, roughly how long does it take to get through the
standard security scan these days?

If he makes the departure lounge, and misses the desired flight,
does he have to stay there waiting for the next flight?

Or can he leave it, retain his "security clearance" and return to
the airport concourse for a meal, bar access, or whatever without
losing his "clearance status"?

Or if he leaves the departure lounge, does he have to go through
the whole security clearance procedure again?

If so, this strikes me as pretty time consuming. As well as
challenging human needs. When I departed from LAX decades ago,
from memory the departure lounge didn't even include a toilet.

I could be wrong, of course, maybe I just didn't notice it.
Anyway, I haven't noticed you on rec.travel.australia+nz since
I started following it.

If, by any chance, you haven't posted on the group earlier, allow
me to be among the first to welcome you to it! A very quiet
group, as groups go, and usually more questions than answers.

> Not like the olden
>days of Standby, where you got a cheap fare at the last minute

A bit sad, that. Never bothered with standby myself, but have
met some people who had got some good deals.

Actually, one of the best "lurks" have ever heard of was a
qualified pilot or co-pilot who successfully traveled around the
world at very minimal cost, although again this was a few decades
ago.

In Aussie lingo, a "lurk" isn't necessarily illegal, just a
clever way to accomplish a given objective.

Lots of corporate jets flying even then. Often just had
a pilot and possibly a co-pilot, but often no passengers.
He would approach pilots, ask where they were going, and ask if
any possibility of a ride. Apparently many were glad to
have him along for someone to talk to, if nothing else.

He managed to circumnavigate the globe, in a series of usually
pretty short hops, and took him over a year, from memory.

Still, a pretty clever way to travel at little cost.

Not only corporate jets, of course, also managed to hitch a ride
on long haul air cargo flights.

Anyway, interesting concept. I don't know if it would be
possible these days.

When I arrived in Australia in the sixties, it was pretty common
for 16 to 18 year old high school students, both male and female,
to safely hitchhike in Australia. Not safe these days, of
course. Even technically illegal.

Out of curiosity, do you consider current security precautions as
insufficient, optimal, or overdone? [You don't have to answer
this one, of course ]

There is the occasional news item where passengers have had nail
clippers confiscated on the grounds that they could be used as a
deadly weapon, which seem a bit much to me.

If going to go that far, it is now technically possible for the
flight crew to fly the aircraft from the ground. Of course, this
might not be too acceptable to the passengers.

Any comments on any of the above?

Cheers,
Kangaroo16
 >> Stay informed about: Standby on International Flights 

On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:34:23 -0600,
texan....usenet RemoveThis @texas...removethisbit.usacom.. wrote in
<da5qj3to67o882va70l0qlhc0ba1e16och RemoveThis @4ax.com> :

>On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:12:29 GMT, kangaroo16 <kangaroo16 RemoveThis @invalid.com>
>wrote:
>
>
>>Actually, the airport is "Nadi" in Fijian, but is pronounced
>>"Nandi" in English. As it is in or near Suva, the code is
>>"SUV".
>>
>
>Nadi's airport code is NAN.
>It's a 30 min flight between NAN and SUV.
>
>E.G.
>Air Fiji 510
>Depart: 5:30pm Nadi, Fiji (NAN)
>Arrive: 6:00pm Suva, Fiji (SUV)
> * Economy
> * 30min
> * Embraer 110 Bandeirante Turboprop
>
>NAN is on the western side of the island, whilst Suva is on the
>eastern side.
>
>Cath
>
I should have checked more web sites, shouldn't I? Still, thanks
for the correction.

Regards,
Kangaroo16
>
 >> Stay informed about: Standby on International Flights 

On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:56:24 -0600,
texan....usenet DeleteThis @texas...removethisbit.usacom.. wrote in
<fb8qj3d8q69h9kpqqta77ev4hfhki0eojn DeleteThis @4ax.com> :

>On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:12:29 GMT, kangaroo16 <kangaroo16 DeleteThis @invalid.com>
>wrote:
>[msge snipped]
>
>>At the time there was another good lurk for cheap travel going,
>>if didn't mind sea travel. By international law, cargo
>>freighters had to provide 10 or 12 passenger cabins, but
>>they were seldom filled up.
>
>Cite of the law please and any subsequent alterations.
>
>Cath

Actually, I would regard it as pretty common knowledge, but as
time permits I don't mind looking up the original law.

As to "all subsequent alterations" that is a bit of an unusual
request. How much are you offering me per hour to do your
extensive legal research for you?

Are you offering an retainer in advance? If so, how much?

Not that I am a qualified "barrister", "solicitor" or even a
qualified "accountant".

However, if you make an adequate offer, I, or someone else on the
group, might refer you to someone else who is suitably qualified.

If you have money to waste, am sure that you can find many
Aussies in the U.S. who would be pleased to offer you a
"quitclaim" deed on their theoretical share of the Sydney Harbour
Bridge.

Cheers,
Kangaroo16



Cheers,
Kangaroo16
 >> Stay informed about: Standby on International Flights 

<texan....usenet.RemoveThis@texas...removethisbit.usacom..> wrote in message
news:ku8qj35m1id44kkt62ietbo4t6mec92jpg@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 19:59:17 -0800, "Calif Bill"
> <bmckeespam.RemoveThis@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Alan S" <nothere.RemoveThis@there.com> wrote in message
>>news:qohpj39ohifdoav65u90gf6da73v6mtmvo@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:12:29 GMT, kangaroo16
>>> <kangaroo16.RemoveThis@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Of course, it was a simpler and more trusting world in those
>>>>days.
>>>
>>> Maybe. However, "standby" was very much in evidence with AA
>>> in the USA last year at ORD and LAX. There were monitor
>>> screens at the boarding lounges showing who was top of the
>>> standby list.
>>>
>
> I find this intriguing as per TSA rules, no-one without a boarding
> pass can gain entry to the departure lounges.
> I had a hell of a time earlier this year in having a special pass
> issued for my daughter to accompany me through the security check and
> to the departure lounge, which she is entitled to so and has done many
> a time, because of my disability. We got it in the end but only
> because I demaned to speak to a supervisor.
>
> Did you have boarding passes for a later flight but were wait-listed
> for 'Space A' [space available] on an earlier departure?
> Note if this is the case, and you have asked for a seat if available
> on an earlier flight, be very aware if it happens again that you are
> deemed a 'voluntary seperation' and your bag/s may not go on the early
> flight. Most airlines will not delivery i.e. you will be required
> to pick them up from the airport.
>
>>> I remember thinking that it may be wise to buy shares in US
>>> airlines at that time as every flight seemed to be 100% full
>>> and just prior to final boarding they would announce that no
>>> standby seats were available. Nor did I see any empty seats
>>> on the plane.
>>>
> Try it at the moment - it's a nightmare with too many passengers
> fighting for too little number of seats!
> And with Thanksgiving next week, I am just so glad I am not working in
> the industry at the moment!
>
>>> Cheers, Alan, Australia
>>> --
>>> http://loraltravel.blogspot.com/
>>> latest: Slovenia
>>> http://loraltraveloz.blogspot.com/
>>> latest: Mossman Gorge in the Daintree Rainforest
>>
>>And those standby's are on tickets that allow changes. So they may be a
>>business man trying be get out on an earlier flight. Not like the olden
>>days of Standby, where you got a cheap fare at the last minute.
>>
>
> Air New Zealand tried 'standby fares' back in the early 1980's as a
> means to fill seats on a relocater 747 between Auckland and
> Christchurch daily [early am flight] and the return flight late
> afternoon/reverse route.
>
> At the time, the standby fare was NZ$49 each way v $96 discounted
> fare.
>
> Unfortunately they discontinued it as it was attracting the clients
> they were not trying to attract. During the week the business
> travellers used it with a ressult NZ was loosing money on 'regular
> flights'.
>
> We used to take advantage of it by flying out from Auckland on a
> Sunday am; just purchase the ticket and be told to go straight to
> check-in. Return, I'd be at the airport 8am on a Saturday morning to
> purchase a ticket [first in/first served loading basis] and never had
> a problem - one flight there were no more than 10 people in economy!
>
> Cath\

They had tickets, so get a boarding pass. Just trying to get on earlier
flight most likely.
 >> Stay informed about: Standby on International Flights 

"kangaroo16" <kangaroo16 RemoveThis @invalid.com> wrote in message
news:8uaqj35rme1l2o5pno7mkii4ogf6cf592d@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 19:59:17 -0800, "Calif Bill"
> <bmckeespam RemoveThis @ix.netcom.com> wrote in
> <13jq5cj2i2mok4b RemoveThis @corp.supernews.com> :
>
>>
>>"Alan S" <nothere RemoveThis @there.com> wrote in message
>>news:qohpj39ohifdoav65u90gf6da73v6mtmvo@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:12:29 GMT, kangaroo16
>>> <kangaroo16 RemoveThis @invalid.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Of course, it was a simpler and more trusting world in those
>>>>days.
>>>
>>> Maybe. However, "standby" was very much in evidence with AA
>>> in the USA last year at ORD and LAX. There were monitor
>>> screens at the boarding lounges showing who was top of the
>>> standby list.
>>>
>>> I remember thinking that it may be wise to buy shares in US
>>> airlines at that time as every flight seemed to be 100% full
>>> and just prior to final boarding they would announce that no
>>> standby seats were available. Nor did I see any empty seats
>>> on the plane.
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers, Alan, Australia
>>> --
>>> http://loraltravel.blogspot.com/
>>> latest: Slovenia
>>> http://loraltraveloz.blogspot.com/
>>> latest: Mossman Gorge in the Daintree Rainforest
>>
>>And those standby's are on tickets that allow changes. So they may be a
>>business man trying be get out on an earlier flight. .
>>
> Greetings, "Calif Bill"!
>
> Thanks for the info update! If they are a business man, though,
> I would assume that they have to go through the usual security
> scan each time, whether they are successful or unsuccessful in
> making the particular flight.
>
> If this is true, roughly how long does it take to get through the
> standard security scan these days?
>
> If he makes the departure lounge, and misses the desired flight,
> does he have to stay there waiting for the next flight?
>
> Or can he leave it, retain his "security clearance" and return to
> the airport concourse for a meal, bar access, or whatever without
> losing his "clearance status"?
>
> Or if he leaves the departure lounge, does he have to go through
> the whole security clearance procedure again?
>
> If so, this strikes me as pretty time consuming. As well as
> challenging human needs. When I departed from LAX decades ago,
> from memory the departure lounge didn't even include a toilet.
>
> I could be wrong, of course, maybe I just didn't notice it.
> Anyway, I haven't noticed you on rec.travel.australia+nz since
> I started following it.
>
> If, by any chance, you haven't posted on the group earlier, allow
> me to be among the first to welcome you to it! A very quiet
> group, as groups go, and usually more questions than answers.
>
>> Not like the olden
>>days of Standby, where you got a cheap fare at the last minute
>
> A bit sad, that. Never bothered with standby myself, but have
> met some people who had got some good deals.
>
> Actually, one of the best "lurks" have ever heard of was a
> qualified pilot or co-pilot who successfully traveled around the
> world at very minimal cost, although again this was a few decades
> ago.
>
> In Aussie lingo, a "lurk" isn't necessarily illegal, just a
> clever way to accomplish a given objective.
>
> Lots of corporate jets flying even then. Often just had
> a pilot and possibly a co-pilot, but often no passengers.
> He would approach pilots, ask where they were going, and ask if
> any possibility of a ride. Apparently many were glad to
> have him along for someone to talk to, if nothing else.
>
> He managed to circumnavigate the globe, in a series of usually
> pretty short hops, and took him over a year, from memory.
>
> Still, a pretty clever way to travel at little cost.
>
> Not only corporate jets, of course, also managed to hitch a ride
> on long haul air cargo flights.
>
> Anyway, interesting concept. I don't know if it would be
> possible these days.
>
> When I arrived in Australia in the sixties, it was pretty common
> for 16 to 18 year old high school students, both male and female,
> to safely hitchhike in Australia. Not safe these days, of
> course. Even technically illegal.
>
> Out of curiosity, do you consider current security precautions as
> insufficient, optimal, or overdone? [You don't have to answer
> this one, of course ]
>
> There is the occasional news item where passengers have had nail
> clippers confiscated on the grounds that they could be used as a
> deadly weapon, which seem a bit much to me.
>
> If going to go that far, it is now technically possible for the
> flight crew to fly the aircraft from the ground. Of course, this
> might not be too acceptable to the passengers.
>
> Any comments on any of the above?
>
> Cheers,
> Kangaroo16

If you leave the secure area, you have to clear security again. There are
food courts, bars, loos, etc. past security these days. Only posted here a
couple of times. Wife and I are planning a trip for 5 or 6 weeks duration
middle Feb. to end of March. Tahiti (Nora Bora), NZ and Northern Oz. Used
to travel on business to Sydney in the 1980's for a company that designed
disk controllers for the DEC Vax super mini computers and other DEC systems
in those days. Just gettting some info on the areas. Like how much to go
to Ayres Rock from Cairns area, etc. What are the must sees in NZ North and
South Island. Is two weeks enough or make it 3 weeks? Have to be back mid
april at latest as 1sr grandbaby is due Apr. 28.
 >> Stay informed about: Standby on International Flights 

On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:10:55 -0800, "Calif Bill"
<bmckeespam RemoveThis @ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>If you leave the secure area, you have to clear security again. There are
>food courts, bars, loos, etc. past security these days. Only posted here a
>couple of times. Wife and I are planning a trip for 5 or 6 weeks duration
>middle Feb. to end of March. Tahiti (Nora Bora), NZ and Northern Oz. Used
>to travel on business to Sydney in the 1980's for a company that designed
>disk controllers for the DEC Vax super mini computers and other DEC systems
>in those days. Just gettting some info on the areas. Like how much to go
>to Ayres Rock from Cairns area, etc. What are the must sees in NZ North and
>South Island. Is two weeks enough or make it 3 weeks? Have to be back mid
>april at latest as 1sr grandbaby is due Apr. 28.
>

I'd suggest at least the three weeks. Also allow some time
for flights and stuffing around in airports; it's a long way
from Auckland to Cairns and from there to Uluru.

I've only seen North Island, and I missed some of it; but
the must-sees are definitely Rotorua and the thermal
districts; the wineries in any area (west of Auckland and in
Hawkes Bay were the ones I enjoyed most) and the art-deco
town of Napier.


Cheers, Alan, Australia
--
http://loraltravel.blogspot.com/
latest: Slovenia
http://loraltraveloz.blogspot.com/
latest: Mossman Gorge in the Daintree Rainforest
 >> Stay informed about: Standby on International Flights 

Alan S <nothere RemoveThis @there.com> wrote in
news:asqtj3tdl2dpdvgk4vaiaf9vbpb8guom27@4ax.com:

> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:10:55 -0800, "Calif Bill"
> <bmckeespam RemoveThis @ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>

Like how much to go to Ayres Rock
>>from Cairns area, etc. What are the must sees in NZ North and South
>>Island. Is two weeks enough or make it 3 weeks? Have to be back mid
>>april at latest as 1sr grandbaby is due Apr. 28.
>>

Alan is, as usual, correct.Go for 3 weeks, don't plan on seeing
"everything" and plan to go back. I am currently planning my own 6 day
excursion to Tasmania (as part of a longer trip already planned) and am
begining to think that I need 6 months. Remember Australia is almost the
same size as the US! a three week trip to the American West wouldn't
give you anything of New England or New York, let alone . . .


--
Joseph Coulter, cruises and vacations
www.josephcoulter.com
yourvacation RemoveThis @comcast.net
877 832 2021
904 631 8863 cell
 >> Stay informed about: Standby on International Flights 

"Joseph Coulter" <seeLOOKATsig.TakeThisOut@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns99EB69637FA3yourvacationcomcastn@216.196.97.136...
> Alan S <nothere.TakeThisOut@there.com> wrote in
> news:asqtj3tdl2dpdvgk4vaiaf9vbpb8guom27@4ax.com:
>
>> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:10:55 -0800, "Calif Bill"
>> <bmckeespam.TakeThisOut@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>
> Like how much to go to Ayres Rock
>>>from Cairns area, etc. What are the must sees in NZ North and South
>>>Island. Is two weeks enough or make it 3 weeks? Have to be back mid
>>>april at latest as 1sr grandbaby is due Apr. 28.
>>>
>
> Alan is, as usual, correct.Go for 3 weeks, don't plan on seeing
> "everything" and plan to go back. I am currently planning my own 6 day
> excursion to Tasmania (as part of a longer trip already planned) and am
> begining to think that I need 6 months. Remember Australia is almost the
> same size as the US! a three week trip to the American West wouldn't
> give you anything of New England or New York, let alone . . .
>
>
> --
> Joseph Coulter, cruises and vacations
> www.josephcoulter.com
> yourvacation.TakeThisOut@comcast.net
> 877 832 2021
> 904 631 8863 cell
>
>

I realize how big Oz is. Have flown from Perth to Sydney. Staying mostly
in the Great Barrier reef, queensland region, but thought maybe a flight
over to Ayres for a couple of days.
 >> Stay informed about: Standby on International Flights 

On 11/16/07 11:10 PM, in article 13jt4vsshpk2k1e.DeleteThis@corp.supernews.com, "Calif
Bill" <bmckeespam.DeleteThis@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>
> "kangaroo16" <kangaroo16.DeleteThis@invalid.com> wrote in message
> news:8uaqj35rme1l2o5pno7mkii4ogf6cf592d@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 19:59:17 -0800, "Calif Bill"
>> <bmckeespam.DeleteThis@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
>> <13jq5cj2i2mok4b.DeleteThis@corp.supernews.com> :
>>
>>>
>>> "Alan S" <nothere.DeleteThis@there.com> wrote in message
>>> news:qohpj39ohifdoav65u90gf6da73v6mtmvo@4ax.com...
>>>> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:12:29 GMT, kangaroo16
>>>> <kangaroo16.DeleteThis@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Of course, it was a simpler and more trusting world in those
>>>>> days.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe. However, "standby" was very much in evidence with AA
>>>> in the USA last year at ORD and LAX. There were monitor
>>>> screens at the boarding lounges showing who was top of the
>>>> standby list.
>>>>
>>>> I remember thinking that it may be wise to buy shares in US
>>>> airlines at that time as every flight seemed to be 100% full
>>>> and just prior to final boarding they would announce that no
>>>> standby seats were available. Nor did I see any empty seats
>>>> on the plane.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers, Alan, Australia
>>>> --
>>>> http://loraltravel.blogspot.com/
>>>> latest: Slovenia
>>>> http://loraltraveloz.blogspot.com/
>>>> latest: Mossman Gorge in the Daintree Rainforest
>>>
>>> And those standby's are on tickets that allow changes. So they may be a
>>> business man trying be get out on an earlier flight. .
>>>
>> Greetings, "Calif Bill"!
>>
>> Thanks for the info update! If they are a business man, though,
>> I would assume that they have to go through the usual security
>> scan each time, whether they are successful or unsuccessful in
>> making the particular flight.
>>
>> If this is true, roughly how long does it take to get through the
>> standard security scan these days?
>>
>> If he makes the departure lounge, and misses the desired flight,
>> does he have to stay there waiting for the next flight?
>>
>> Or can he leave it, retain his "security clearance" and return to
>> the airport concourse for a meal, bar access, or whatever without
>> losing his "clearance status"?
>>
>> Or if he leaves the departure lounge, does he have to go through
>> the whole security clearance procedure again?
>>
>> If so, this strikes me as pretty time consuming. As well as
>> challenging human needs. When I departed from LAX decades ago,
>> from memory the departure lounge didn't even include a toilet.
>>
>> I could be wrong, of course, maybe I just didn't notice it.
>> Anyway, I haven't noticed you on rec.travel.australia+nz since
>> I started following it.
>>
>> If, by any chance, you haven't posted on the group earlier, allow
>> me to be among the first to welcome you to it! A very quiet
>> group, as groups go, and usually more questions than answers.
>>
>>> Not like the olden
>>> days of Standby, where you got a cheap fare at the last minute
>>
>> A bit sad, that. Never bothered with standby myself, but have
>> met some people who had got some good deals.
>>
>> Actually, one of the best "lurks" have ever heard of was a
>> qualified pilot or co-pilot who successfully traveled around the
>> world at very minimal cost, although again this was a few decades
>> ago.
>>
>> In Aussie lingo, a "lurk" isn't necessarily illegal, just a
>> clever way to accomplish a given objective.
>>
>> Lots of corporate jets flying even then. Often just had
>> a pilot and possibly a co-pilot, but often no passengers.
>> He would approach pilots, ask where they were going, and ask if
>> any possibility of a ride. Apparently many were glad to
>> have him along for someone to talk to, if nothing else.
>>
>> He managed to circumnavigate the globe, in a series of usually
>> pretty short hops, and took him over a year, from memory.
>>
>> Still, a pretty clever way to travel at little cost.
>>
>> Not only corporate jets, of course, also managed to hitch a ride
>> on long haul air cargo flights.
>>
>> Anyway, interesting concept. I don't know if it would be
>> possible these days.
>>
>> When I arrived in Australia in the sixties, it was pretty common
>> for 16 to 18 year old high school students, both male and female,
>> to safely hitchhike in Australia. Not safe these days, of
>> course. Even technically illegal.
>>
>> Out of curiosity, do you consider current security precautions as
>> insufficient, optimal, or overdone? [You don't have to answer
>> this one, of course ]
>>
>> There is the occasional news item where passengers have had nail
>> clippers confiscated on the grounds that they could be used as a
>> deadly weapon, which seem a bit much to me.
>>
>> If going to go that far, it is now technically possible for the
>> flight crew to fly the aircraft from the ground. Of course, this
>> might not be too acceptable to the passengers.
>>
>> Any comments on any of the above?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Kangaroo16
>
> If you leave the secure area, you have to clear security again. There are
> food courts, bars, loos, etc. past security these days.
>
<snip>

Not in LAX Bradley Terminal. I was unable to get any food unless I left the
secure area. I was stunned. It was midnight and I had had nothing to eat
since I left YVR at 5 o'clock in the afternoon. The only airport I had that
problem though. SFO was fine coming home.

--
Martha Irwin T2 Canada
1500mg., 4mg. Avandia
 >> Stay informed about: Standby on International Flights